Professor: J.P. Pretti | Term: Fall 2022
Introduction to the Language of Mathematics
Sets
Sets are not ordered.
Denote element of set by
, but .
,
,
set of integers, set of natural numbers, set of rational numbers, set of real numbers
Mathematical Statements and Negation
Statements are true or false.
is a statement
is not a statement (Open sentence. If you knew , it would be a statement)
is a statement
Open sentence statement.
Negation
is a statement
Negation of is true when is false.
Quantifiers and Quantified Statements
Universal and Existential Quantifiers
is an open statement.
. This is “for all natural numbers ” We know this is true.
Changing the domain makes it false.
When domain is empty is always true.
is true. All elephants in the room have 20 legs
Let universally quantifying the following statement.
Existential Quantifier
. This is “there exists a number in the set such that is true.” There just has to be one such case.
.
Once again, domain matters.
is always false.
Exercises
Negating Quantifiers
Everybody in this room was born before 2010 Universal
Somebody in this room was born after 2010, or on 2010 Existential
is false when there is at least one for which is false.
Fact
We cannot just change all the signs since might be complicated.
. Negation:
Someone in this room was born before 1990. Everyone in this room was born after or during 1990 is the negation.
. Negation: .
Nested Quantifiers
is false for every and every .
is true. is in the open statement
is true.
is false. If was fixed, there is no way every will work.
Logical Analysis of Mathematical Statements
Logical Operators
Statement represented by .
Conjunction and Disjunction
and is
is irrational and is true.
10 is even and is true.
is true.
is false.
or is
is true.
is a prime number of has is false.
is a perfect square or is a multiple of is true.
Logical Equivalence
. is logically equivalent to not not .
Definition
De Morgan’s Laws
Example, show
Implication
”If then ”,
Equivalent to
= hypothesis, is conclusion
is irrational, True.
is irrational, False.
is rational, True.
is rational, True.
For all real numbers , if True.
For all real numbers , if True.
, if , then is true.
, if , then is false.
, if , then is true.
For all , if , then
whenever and
Negation of Implication
Negation of implication is not an implication.
If is a prime and , then is a perfect square (false).
is prime and and is not a perfect square (true).
Negation of implication is and. Hypothesis is not always first.
Implication Examples
For all
If , then (true)
If , then (true)
Contrapositive and Converse
Contrapositive
The contrapositive of is the implication
If , then (true)
If , then (true)
Logically equivalent with
Converse
The converse of is the implication
If , then (false)
If , then (true)
Not logically equivalent with
If and Only If
Logical operator
For all iff
True both ways.
iff is True
Proving Mathematical Statements
Prove:
Let
Faulty logic: Prove by squaring both sides
Proving Universally Quantified Statements
Proving
We can consider arbitrary and argue that must be true (direct proof).
Prove an identity
Prove
for all
Case 1: . In this case . And
Case 2: . In this case . And
In both cases, LHS = RHS
Disprove Universally Quantified Statement
A counter example is .
Single example doesn’t prove is true.
Single counter example does prove is false.
Prove Existentially Quantified Statements
There exists a perfect square such that .
Consider . Since is a perfect square. Also completing the proof.
Disprove Existential Statement
We will prove the negation is true.
”There exists a real number such that "
"For all real numbers such that “
Since , then
For all , there exists , such that
Proof
Let . Consider . Clearly . Moreover,
Proving Implications
If is an even integer, then is an even integer.
Proof
Assume is an even integer.
That is for some integer
We must show
We have
Since , then . That is, picking completes the proof.
For all integers , if is a perfect square, then is a perfect square
Since , then . Thus is a perfect square.
Divisibility of Integers
An integer divides an integer if there exists an integer so that .
We write is divides
is a number, is a statement.
Transitivity of Divisibility
For all if and then .
Proof
Let . Assume and then and for some .
Substituting gives
Notice that because . Thus by the definition of divisibility.
Divisibility of Integer Combinations
For all if and then for all integers .
e.g.
DIC for all
Proof
Let . Assume and . Then and for some . Now
Since , then .
Proposition
Proposition
For all if or , then
Note
Let , and be statement variables
Proof
Let
First we prove
So suppose for some
Then
Since , then . Hence
To complete this proof, we must show . The argument in this case is similar.
Another Example
For all if for all then
Proof
Let
Assume
Choosing , gives
This is not choosing a number for all integers . We are assuming the hypothesis is correct.
For all if , then
This is false. Counter example
and
TD:
and , we know , by TD.
Proof of Contrapositive
Example
For all integers , if is odd, then is odd.
Proof
Let . We will show the contrapositive is true.
Assume is even. That is for some integer . Substitute to get
Since is an integer, then . That is is even.
Example
If . If is irrational then is irrational or is irrational.
Proof
Let . We will use the contrapositive.
Assume and for some integers where .
Then moreover since then . Also . That is is rational.
Example
Let . If , then .
Proof
Let . Suppose then .
We get that . Therefore the contrapositive is true, proving the original statement is true as well.
Example
Let
If then or .
Proof
Let .
Using “elimination”, assume and . By TD .
Why does this work?
Proof by Contradiction
or must always be false.
is always false, calling it true is a contradiction.
We can prove that statement is true by, assuming is true then based on this assumption, prove that both and are true for some statement .
Prove that
By way of contradiction (BWOC), assume that for some . Then Since , then . However we know that . This is a contradiction, completing the proof.
Prove is irrational.
Assume it is rational, .
where are integers .
Assume they are not even. If they were even, and and thus and .
, so is even.
Assume its odd
. must be even.
an integer such that ,
. must be even then which is a contradiction.
is irrational.
Proving is true by contradiction, we assume is false. is true, is false. If we can prove this is a contradiction, is true.
if and , then .
For sake of contradiction, there exists integers such that and and .
By DIC we have contradiction.
Proving If and Only If Statements
Example
Let where . Then iff
Proof
Let where .
We will prove this in both directions ()
Assume .
() Assume
Mathematical Induction
Notation for Summations, Products and Recurrences
Summation Notation
Product Notation
Proof by Induction
Statement
Proof
We will proceed by induction on .
Base Case
We consider when
Then
And
That is, the statement is true when .
Inductive Step
Let be an arbitrary natural number.
Assume
Consider when
Then
And
That is, the statement is true when . Therefore by POMI, the proof is complete.
Definition
POMI
Let be a statement that depends on . If statement 1 and 2 are true
For all , if , then
Then statement 3 is true.
- For all
POMI doesn’t have to start at 1.
Let be the open sentence
Prove is true for all .
Base Case
Assume is true
Inductive Step
6 divides the sum by DIC.
This is similar to recursion in CS135.
Binomial Coefficients
“5 choose 2”
when .
Theorem
Pascals Identity
Binomial Theorem
Theorem
BT1
Theorem
BT2
Practice
Prove that for all integers ,
Let in BT1
What is the coefficient of in
By BT2
Example
Define and for
Prove that for all .
Proof by Induction on .
Base Case: True when
Inductive Step:
Let be an arbitrary natural number where .
Let be the open sentence.
Assume are all true. Then what happens to ?
Consider
Then
Hence the proof is done by POSI. Difference between POMI and POSI is not base cases.
Principal of Strong Induction
Definition
Let be a statement that depends on . If
is true, and
Example
Prove that breaks are needed to break an chocolate bar into individual pieces.
Proof
. We will proceed by induction on .
Base Case
When , no breaks are needed.
Since , the statement is true for .
Inductive Step
Let .
Suppose the statement is true when .
Consider and the first break. We are left with 2 smaller bars. Let and be the number of pieces in these smaller bars.
Then . Also . Breaking these two bars requires breaks by our IH.
For the original bar, we require
breaks. By POSI this completes the proof.
Sets
Introduction
The number of elements in a set is cardinality. Denoted by .
but
empty set but
is not an empty set
Set-Builder Notation
Universal set contains the objects we are concerned with (universe of discourse universal set).
Notation:
“The set of all in such that is true”.
for some
Set of positive factors of 12
Set of even integers
Set-Builder Notation Type 2
“all objects in of the form “
Even set of integers
Perfect squares
Multiples of 12
Set-Builder Notation Type 3
or
Set consisting of all objects of the form such that is an element of and is true.
Integer powers of
Perfect squares larger than
Multiples of
Odd perfect squares:
Set Operations
Union of 2 sets & is the set of all elements in either
e.g.
Intersection of 2 sets & is the set of elements in both
Set Difference of 2 sets & or is the set of all elements in but not in .
The complement of a set or is the set of elements in the universal set but not in .
(When ) Let
Subsets of a Set
Two sets are disjoint when .
Any set and its complement are disjoint.
Any set and are disjoint.
A set is a subset of set if every element of is an element of . Denoted by: . If is not a subset of , that is denoted by .
and
A set is a proper set of if there is at least one element of that is not in . ( must be a subset). .
(not a proper subset since )
and
All proper subsets are subsets
If , then .
Subsets, Set Equality, and Implications
Given and , prove
Prove the implication
Example: Let and . Show that .
Proof: Let and assume . Then for . Then . , set and we can see . Thus , .
Let and Prove .
Let since . Then , such that
since
Given & , prove .
Prove and .
Show or
Let and . Prove
Let . Then . When . So
Let . Then or . must be or . .
Since we have shown both and .
Proving General Statements
Prove
Proof: Let , then and . Thus so .
Prove that if and only if
() Assume . Then and .
Let . Then and so
Let . Then or . If , since , then and vice versa.
Thus .
() Assume
Let . Then so .
Let . Then so .
We have shown it both ways so and .
The Greatest Common Divisor
Definition
Bounds by Divisibility
For all , if and , then
Proof
Let
Assume and
Then there exists such that .
From this we get
This tells us
Since m then .
Since , then
Sub into equation to get
Since , so .
Division Algorithm
For all and for all there exists unique integers and such that
Examples
Greatest Common Divisor (GCD)
Divisors of
Divisors of
Definition
Formal Definition
Let
When and are not both zero, we say an integer is the [greatest common divisor of and , and write iff
for all integers , if and then
Otherwise, we say
Examples
Fact
For all
Proof
Let . Let
Case 1
In this case, by definition,
Also and in this case, thus as well.
Case 2 or
Note that or in this case as well. Since , we know and . We get by DIC since we also know .
To complete the proof we let and assume and
All we must show is . Using DIC again we get
Hence by definition of
Definition
GCD with Remainders (GCD w R)
For all , if then
Example
Alternative proof of our fact
Clearly
By GCD w R,
Euclidean Algorithm (EA)
Process to compute for
The last non-zero will be GCD since remainder is non-negative and .
Bigger example: Compute
Back Substitution
Certificate of Correctness and Bézout’s Lemma
Definition
For all where . If and and there exists such that then .
Example
Definition
Bézout’s Lemma
For all integers , there exists such that
Definition
GCD w R
then
Definition
GCD CT
If and exists , then
Definition
BL
If , there exists such that
Example
For all
Proof 1
Since , GCD w R gives us . However because 1 is the only positive divisor of 1
Proof 2
Since
and , then by GCD CT.
Proof 3
Suppose and then by DIC, Thus is the only divisor, that is GCD = 1.
Example
Let , where . If then .
Proof
Let . Assume and
Division gives
since
Since
Moreover and
Thus by GCD LT,
Example
For all
If then
Proof
Let . Assume . Let
By BL, there are integers such that and multiply to get
Thus
Since are integers, (by definition), (by definition), , we get by GCD CT.
Extended Euclidian Algorithm
Solve for
Thus
EEA with and
Solve for and
Order is irrelevant for gcd.
From before and
Further Properties of the Greatest Common Divisor
Proof of CDD GCD (Common Divisor Divides)
Let . Assume and .
By BL, for some
By DIC, . That is .
Definition
Let
When , we say and are coprime.
Theorem
Coprimeness Characterization Theorem
and are coprime iff there exists integers and with .
Sketch of CCT Proof BL GCD CT
Exercise
Let .
If , then and
a) Prove or disprove
Let . Assume .
By CCT, for some
Since by CCT
Since by CCT
b) Prove or disprove the converse
If and , then
Let . Assume .
By CCT, and for some
Multiply to yield
After expanding and rearranging, CCT gives us because .
Definition
Division by GCD (DB GCD)
If then .
Let such that .
By BL, for some .
Divide by d
since
Note and by definition of , so are . Thus by CCT
Definition
Proof of Coprimeness and Divisibility (CAD)
If and are integers and and , then .
Proof
Let .
Assume and
by CCT for some
Multiply both sides by to get
We know and we assumed so by DIC, (because ).
That is,
Note
is false.
Prime Numbers
Definition
Prime Factorization
Every integer greater than 1, can be written as the product of primes.
Proof
Proceed by Strong Induction (can’t use POMI) to prove that an integer can always be written as a product of primes.
Base Case
When , by itself is a product of primes since 2 is prime.
Inductive Step
Let be an arbitrary integer greater than 2.
Assume can be written as the product of primes for all integers such that .
We will consider cases for
When is prime, there is nothing to prove.
Otherwise, is composite.
That is for some satisfying
By our inductive hypothesis, and can each be written as the product of primes. Multiplying these products gives a product of primes equal to . Hence the statement is true by POSI.
Theorem
Euclid’s Theorem
There are infinitely many primes.
Proof
By way of contradiction, assume there are a finite number of primes. We will name them for some .
Consider
By PF, for some
However, also by definition.
By DIC, we get
That is, . This is a contradiction because 1 is the only positive divisor of 1.
Theorem
Euclid’s Lemma
For all and primes , if , then or .
Proof
Let . Let be prime.
Assume and (elimination).
Since the only positive divisors of are 1 and , and .
Thus by CAD.
Unique Factorization Theorem
Every natural number can be written as a product of prime factors uniquely, apart from order.
Example
Let be prime. Prove that is a perfect square iff .
If
Other direction:
UFT or
or (wrong).
Prime Factorization and the Greatest Common Divisor
If and where are primes and all exponents are non-negative.
Examples
And
Linear Diophantine Equations
The Existence of Solutions in Two Variables
Given , find such that
-
Is there a solution? LDET 1
-
If so, how can we find one? EEA
-
And can we find all solutions? LDET 2
Examples of
1) Use EEA
Thus
Thus , is a solution.
2) There is no solution because , but (not a multiple of ).
3) Multiply equation in 1) by to get:
Other solutions to 1)?
Rewrite as
Definition
LDET 1
Let (both not zero) and let the LDE has a solution if and only if .
First, suppose there exists such that .
We know and (by definition of gcd), so by DIC.
Next we suppose to prove the other direction.
By BL there exists such that .
Now we also know for some integer . Multiplying by gives
Since and , the proof is complete.
Finding All Solutions in Two Variables
Definition
LDET 2
Let where .
If is one solution to the LDE , then the complete solution is
LDET 2 Example
We found that was a particular solution to .
LDET 2 tells us the complete solution is
Examples of some solutions are:
Exercise
Solve the following LDEs:
1)
, no solutions.
2)
LDET 2 Proof
Let where and .
Assume for some .
Define and and
Must show how
We begin by showing .
Let .
We must show .
To do this we substitute into to get
Indeed .
Now we must show .
Let . Then .
We also know .
Equating gives
Thus
Since , we divide and get the following.
This tells us
By DBGCD, . By CAD, we know . Thus . Thus for some .
That is . Substitution into () yields . Thus .
Exercise
Find all satisfying
.
We will solve the LDE first.
Note that it is equivalent to
By inspection, a solution (7,4).
So by LDET 2, the complete solution is
and where
We also need
Thus or .
Thus the final answer is
Congruence and Modular Arithmetic
Congruence
is congruent to modulo .
Definition
Let . Let .
We say is congruent to module when .
We write
Otherwise we write .
Examples
Let . Let
Elementary Properties of Congruence
Let . Let .
Reflexive: Symmetric: Transitivity: and
Proof of Reflexivity:
Since and , we have . That is .
Proof of Symmetric:
Assume
This means for some . .
Since .
That is .
Proof of Transitivity:
Assume and .
.
By DIC, .
That is .
Proposition 2
If and , then
Proof of 1.
Proof of 3.
Proof of is left as an exercise.
Definition
CAM (Generalization of Proposition 2)
For all positive integers , for all integers and , if for all then
Definition
Congruence of Power
For all positive integers and .
.
Question: Does 7 divide
Is ?
We will “reduce modulo 7”
Congruence and Division
Examples
Let . Let .
If and then .
Examples
Exercise
Does 72 divide
By CAR, CAM and CP:
But
Thus by CER, our number is not congruent to 0 modulo 72. Thus it does not.
Proof of CD
Let . Let .
Assume and .
Then or equivalently .
By CAD, . That is, .
Congruence and Remainders
Congruent iff Same Remainder (CISR) and Congruent to Remainder (CTR) Examples
1) What is the remainder when is divided by 4.
We will find such that and . By CTR, this will be our answer.
By CER, CAM, and CP:
The answer is 3.
2) What is the last digit (units) of
The answer will be such that and (By (TR)).
By CER, CAM, and CP
The answer is 6.
Proof of CISR
Let . Let .
By DA,
Then,
where
Now we assume .
Thus, by our equation for . That is .
Next, we assume .
Then for some .
Substituting and rearranging gives,
So since . Thus by our inequality for .
We get , completing the proof.
Definition
CTR
For all with , iff has remainder when divided by .
if
Divisibility Tests
Let be an integer. Then we can write.
for digits
What about ?
Since .
Thus, by CER
iff .
?
so we can deduce that is divisibly by 9 iff the sum of its digits are divisible by
e.g.
. 46 is not divisible by 9, the number is not divisible by 9.
?
Linear Congruences
Let .
Let where .
Find all such that
-
Is there a solution?
-
If so can we find one?
-
If so can we find them all?
Example
Solve
Linear Diophantine . . no solution, no values.
Rewrite
Answer in congruence is .
By CTR, every integer is congruent to .
Try all of them and see which one works.
By CER, CAM, if is a solution, are solutions.
GCD is the number of solutions in the set
Complete solution is .
Using LDE’s we get .
Complete solution is .
and represent the exact same set of integers.
Theorem
Linear Congruence Theorem (LCT)
Complete solution equivalently,
Informally, LCT tells us there
-
is one solution modulo or
-
solutions modulo
Solve
Congruence Classes and Modular Arithmetic
Definition
Let . Let .
The congruence class of modulo is
Example
Let
The congruence class of 3 modulo 5 is:
is an infinite set
(both subsets of each other)
is our most common representative from this set because
Operations
Let . Let . We define
Examples
Note
Addition is well-defined
Multiplication is as well.
Definition
Let . The integers modulo are
Let where .
is the additive identity is the multiplication identity is the additive inverse of
Multiplicative inverse of (if exists) is an element such that and we write .
Examples
In does exist? Does exist?
is a solution, so
. Only 12 combinations, none where .
Modular Arithmetic Solution
Let .
The equation in has a solution iff .
If is one solution, then there are solutions given by,
Review
In , solve
) has no solution.
) . 5 solutions. , spanned by 2
)
. solution.
.
Definition
Inverses in (INV )
Let with . has a multiplicative inverse iff . Multiplicative inverse is unique.
Definition
Inverses in (INV )
For all prime numbers and have a unique multiplicative inverse.
Fermat’s Little Theorem (FT)
Theorem
Let be prime. Let .
If , then .
Examples
but not by FT.
Exercise
What is the remainder when is divided by 11?
Since 11 is prime and , .
By CAM, CER, CP. Thus, the remainder is 5.
Notes
We can write as in . In this case
Idea of Proof of FT
Let and .
No zero, all distinct.
Corollary to FT
Let be prime. Let .
Then
Proof
Let be prime. Let . We will use cases.
When , by FT, . Multiplying gives by CAM.
When , . Thus by CP. Thus by CER.
The statement is true in all cases.
Exercise
What is the remainder when is divided by 11.
Simultaneous Congruences Examples
Solve . If moduli are coprime, always get one solution.
Rewrite the second statement as where .
Thus we want to find all satisfying:
Sub to get
The solution is
Chinese Remainder Theorem
Theorem
Suppose and
There is a unique solution module to the system
That is, once we have one solution , CRT also tells us the full solution is
Theorem
Generalized CRT
If and then for any integers there exists a solution to simultaneous congruences.
The complete solution is
Exercises
.
Rewrite the second equation as where . Sub into the first equation to get
Since 1 is a solution, the full solution is by LCT.
Rewrite as where . Sub to get .
Final answer is .
Splitting the Modulus
Definition
Let and be coprime positive integers. For any two integers and ,
Exercise
What is the units digit of ?
Rough
So we get
To complete the problem, we solve
by FT
The RSA Public-Key Encryption Scheme
Cool history lesson about William Tutte
Message encrypt transmit cipher decrypt message
Math functions (easy to encrypt), hard to decrypt (invert) without info.
RSA Scheme
Setup (Bob)
-
Randomly choose two large, distinct primes and and let
-
Select arbitrary integer such that and
-
Solve for an integer where
-
Publish the public key
-
Keep the private key secret, and the primes and
Encryption (Alice does the following to send a message as ciphertext to Bob)
-
Obtain a copy of Bob’s public key
-
Construct the message , an integer such that
-
Encrypt as the ciphertext , given by where
-
Send to Bob
Decryption (Bob does the following to decrypt)
-
Use the private key to decrypt the ciphertext as the received message , given by where
-
Claim:
Setup
where . .
Public key .
Private key .
Encryption
Generate message where
Decryption
8 is the original message that Alice wanted to send.
Exercise
Let
public key?
private key?
if what is ?
Public key:
Private key: solve ,
Square and multiply, then use SMT if you know and .
Complex Numbers
Standard Form
Complex Numbers
Examples
- standard form
For , we call the real part and theimaginary part.
and
means and
is purely real
purely imaginary
Arithmetic
Addition:
Multiplication:
Informally we can treat elements of as “normal” algebraic expressions where and when we do that “everything works”.
0 is the additive identity in and is the additive inverse of in .
Subtraction
Let . We define
1 is the multiplicative identity in . is the unique multiplicative inverse of
Division
Why is
Alternatively
Properties of Complex Arithmetic (PCA)
Let with
Proof that multiplicative inverses are unique in .
Let where .
Suppose and for .
Then
Thus
Conjugate and Modulus
Warm-up
since
. Let .
Definition
Let be a complex number in standard form
The complex conjugate of is
Examples
Properties of Complex Conjugate (PCJ)
Let . Then,
- z + = ;
can be proved by using standard form and showing .
Proof of .
Suppose where .
Therefore exists and by PCA.
We get .
Thus . That is,
Exercise
Solve
Rough work
When .
When , or, .
Thus there are 4 solutions.
Definition
Modulus
Let .
The modulus of is .
Examples
Properties of Modulus
iff if , then
Proof of the fourth statement above.
Let .
Consider
Since the modulus of every complex number is a non-negative real number, we get
Complex Plane and Polar Form
Complex Plane
Imaginary axis is axis, real axis is axis.
is the reflection of in the real axis.
is the distance from to the origin
is considered to be vector addition.
Polar Form
Standard form: Cartesian Coordinates: Polar Coordinates: Polar Form:
Standard Form
Definition
The polar form of a complex number is
where and (an argument) is an angle measured counter-clockwise from the real axis.
Note
Polar form is not unique (add multiples of 2).
Examples
Convert to standard form
Convert from standard form
in standard form.
Write in polar form.
.
Thus
Definition
Polar Multiplication of Complex Numbers
De Moivre’s Theorem (DMT)
Theorem
For all and
Proof of Polar Multiplication in (PM)
Multiply in standard form and use trig identities.
Proof of DMT
When , this is induction. When , we can translate to the previous case.
Using rules for and .
DMT Examples
Write in standard form.
Write in standard form
Note
Multiplying by corresponds to rotating
Complex -th Roots Theorem (CNRT)
Root Examples
Solve Let in polar form.
In polar form, Equating gives that
Since and , we get .
Also where .
We get
Roots of Unity
Solve
Square Roots and the Quadratic Formula
Definition
Quadratic Formula
For all , the solutions to are,
Polynomials
Introduction
Fields
All non-zero numbers have a multiplicative inverse. iff or
when is prime.
Arithmetic of Polynomials
Polynomials
No negative exponents, no fractional exponents.
when .
Terminology/Notation
is indeterminate.
- complex polynomial (not real)
- degree is
- cubic polynomial
- in
- means corresponding coefficients are equal
- polynomial equation (if there was an equal sign). Solution to that is a root.
Degree of a Product
Definition
Division Algorithm for Polynomials
If , then such that where is the 0 polynomial or
If is 0,
Polynomial Arithmetic
Let and . Compute .
Find the and where
Yields and
Check
Exercise 3
Prove
BWOC suppose in .
Then by DP we have
for some and .
If they are equal, coefficients must be the same.
Comparing coefficients:
Second and third above
Roots of Complex Polynomials and the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
Theorem
Remainder Theorem (RT)
For all fields , all polynomials , and all , the remainder polynomial when is divided by is the constant polynomial .
Proof
Let where is a field. Let .
By DAP,
for unique where is the zero polynomial or .
Regardless, for some .
Alas,
Takeaway
Finding roots corresponds to finding linear factors.
Theorem
Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (FTA)
Every complex polynomial of complex degrees has a root.
Complex Polynomials of Degree Have Roots (CPN) Proof Discovery
Induction on degrees.
Base Case
If has degree
By FTA, has a root. Name it .
Then
Multiplicity
The multiplicity of root of a polynomial is the largest possible integer such that is a factor of .
Reducible and Irreducible Polynomial
Polynomial in of positive degree is a reducible polynomial in when it can be written as the product of 2 polynomials of positive degree.
Otherwise we say that the polynomial is irreducible in .
is irreducible in
BWOC suppose is the product of where . Then compare coefficients.
Prove that has no roots in but is reducible.
Prove factors don’t have roots to prove no roots (lots of ways to show no roots)
Write as a product of irreducible factors in
Write as a product of irreducible factors
Factor as a product of linear factors.
Hint is a root
The roots of this quotient are where by QF.
Let where
Then
So the roots are .
That is
and
Roots are
Hence the final answer is
Write as a product of irreducible polynomials given that is a root.
Real Polynomials and Conjugate Roots Theorem
, if and , then . Depends on the fields.
By CJRT, is also a root. Thus, is a factor.
This quadratic factor equals,
Now we use long division to yield,
By QF, the roots of are
Therefore,
or
or
Definition
Real Quadratic Factors
If for some with , real quadratic irreducible polynomial and real polynomial such that
Definition
Real Factors of Real Polynomials
Every non-constant with real coefficients can be written as a product of real linear and quadratic factors.
Proof of CJRT
Let . Where .
Let and assume
Now we get,